Which of the following is NOT a method of hazard mitigation?

In the context of hazard mitigation, effective strategies typically focus on methods that either eliminate or lessen the risk associated with hazardous situations. The goal is to proactively manage potential dangers to ensure safety and minimize impact.

The correct answer emphasizes that ignoring hazards does not address them and can lead to increased vulnerability and risk. Ignoring a hazard means that no action is taken to assess, control, or mitigate the risk, which could result in severe consequences during an emergency.

On the other hand, the other options represent valid methods of hazard mitigation. Avoiding a hazard means taking actions to completely steer clear of situations where risks are present. Reducing exposure involves implementing measures to lessen the likelihood that individuals will come into contact with hazards. Monitoring refers to the continuous observation and assessment of risks, allowing for timely responses and interventions when hazards are identified.

By contrasting these effective strategies with the act of ignoring hazards, it becomes clear that ignoring a risk is not a viable form of hazard mitigation, thus reinforcing why it is the correct answer to the question posed.